Dating shroud of turin

Morphology: Several features of the man in the Shroud appear to be distorted, and he is unusually tall, compared to the average height of a first-century Jewish man.Also, he was clearly not in the cloth, as the image does not show the sides of the head or body.Controversy surrounds the Shroud of Turin (hereafter ‘the Shroud’), which some say is the authentic burial cloth of Jesus Christ.This cloth shows the front and rear image of a man who appears to have undergone a lot of torture.There is no ‘paper trail’ that gives us a clear chain of custody and it cannot be known that earlier objects with similar claims (e.g. Manufacturing: It is possible that the image on the Shroud was formed by common biochemical reactions called Maillard reactions.But, even if the Shroud was once wrapped around a human body, this would preclude the body of Jesus because these reactions are associated with decomposition.Called the Shroud of Turin, it is claimed to be the burial shroud of Jesus Christ.Strangely, it bears the full-length frontal and dorsal negative imprint of a man’s body (figure 1).

He is a leading expert on the Shroud of Turin and has spent 30 years studying it.However, despite their attempted re-evaluation of the radiocarbon dates, the only conclusion one can draw from them is that the Shroud is not 2,000 years old.We reject the idea that Jesus’ body disappeared from within the Shroud while emitting neutron radiation, which supposedly left traces on the front and rear sides of the Shroud.Figure 1: The Shroud of Turin contains a faint dorsal (top half) and frontal (lower half) image of a man, with many features paralleling the Crucifixion.Yet, the historical record of the Shroud is spotty, multiple features on it conflict with the biblical record of events, and carbon dating places it squarely in the medieval era.

Leave a Reply